- Arts & Culture 5939
- Business & Economics 689
- Computers 319
- Dictionaries & Encyclopedias 81
- Education & Science 75882
- Abstracts 252
- Astrology 4
- Astronomy 1
- Biology 8
- Chemistry 2221
- Coursework 15546
- Culture 9
- Diplomas 411
- Drawings 574
- Ecology 6
- Economy 83
- English 75
- Ethics, Aesthetics 3
- For Education Students 17613
- Foreign Languages 11
- Geography 3
- Geology 1
- History 89
- Maps & Atlases 5
- Mathematics 13856
- Musical Literature 2
- Pedagogics 19
- Philosophy 23
- Physics 14857
- Political Science 5
- Practical Work 101
- Psychology 60
- Religion 4
- Russian and culture of speech 8
- School Textbooks 7
- Sexology 42
- Sociology 9
- Summaries, Cribs 87
- Test Answers 150
- Tests 9243
- Textbooks for Colleges and Universities 32
- Theses 24
- To Help Graduate Students 14
- To Help the Entrant 37
- Vetting 364
- Works 13
- Информатика 10
- Engineering 3063
- Fiction 696
- House, Family & Entertainment 107
- Law 132
- Website Promotion 71
Share capital and book value of assets
Uploaded: 20.01.2020
Content: S19-561.docx 16,8 kB
Product description
The authorized capital and book value of the assets of Uraltechprom JSC are 100 and 200 million rubles, respectively. Its general director concluded a sale and purchase agreement with Zarya LLC, according to which the machines, equipment and storage facilities belonging to Uraltekhprom JSC were transferred to the latter. The buyer transferred the purchase price to the seller’s bank account - 80 million rubles.
The Dorozhnik cooperative (a shareholder of Uraltechprom), through an arbitration court, demanded that the transaction be declared invalid and that the property transferred under the agreement be returned to the balance sheet of Uraltechprom JSC. He argued that the transaction was completed by the general director of the company in excess of authority, and when transferring the property to the buyer, acts of acceptance and transfer of property and a deed of transfer were not drawn up.
At the hearing, it turned out that after the execution of the contract of sale, the transaction was discussed by the board of directors of the joint-stock company and 75% of its payroll approved it.
Another shareholder of Uraltechprom, LLC Remstroy, challenged in an arbitration court an agreement concluded by the general director of the joint-stock company on the purchase of raw materials for the production of basic products, according to which the buyer paid the supplier 55 million rubles. The reason was also the excess by the general director of the company of his own authority. At a meeting of the board of directors of Uraltechprom JSC, this transaction was not considered.
Give an analysis of the situation.
Additional information
After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2009-2019 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.
Feedback
0Period | |||
1 month | 3 months | 12 months | |
0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 |