- Arts & Culture 5939
- Business & Economics 689
- Computers 310
- Dictionaries & Encyclopedias 81
- Education & Science 71768
- Abstracts 252
- Astrology 4
- Astronomy 1
- Biology 8
- Chemistry 2021
- Coursework 15546
- Culture 9
- Diplomas 411
- Drawings 574
- Ecology 6
- Economy 83
- English 75
- Ethics, Aesthetics 3
- For Education Students 14480
- Foreign Languages 11
- Geography 3
- Geology 1
- History 89
- Maps & Atlases 5
- Mathematics 13856
- Musical Literature 2
- Pedagogics 19
- Philosophy 23
- Physics 14191
- Political Science 5
- Practical Work 101
- Psychology 60
- Religion 4
- Russian and culture of speech 8
- School Textbooks 7
- Sexology 42
- Sociology 9
- Summaries, Cribs 87
- Test Answers 150
- Tests 9129
- Textbooks for Colleges and Universities 32
- Theses 24
- To Help Graduate Students 14
- To Help the Entrant 36
- Vetting 364
- Works 13
- Информатика 10
- Engineering 3058
- Fiction 696
- House, Family & Entertainment 107
- Law 132
- Website Promotion 71
In February 1998, the Qualification Collegium of Judges
Uploaded: 10.01.2020
Content: S19-361.docx 18,3 kB
Product description
In February 1998, the qualification collegium of judges of the Yamal-Nenets Autonomous Okrug dismissed the applicant to the European Court of Human Rights, a citizen of the Russian Federation P., a judge of the district court of Noyabrsk and a member of the Zhivaya Vera church from the position of a judge due to abuse of her official position for the implementation of religious activities in the interests of the church.
P. filed a complaint with the Higher Qualification Collegium of Judges of the Russian Federation. In May 1998, the College rejected P.´s complaint, after which she filed a complaint with the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation - the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation acknowledged that the applicant was engaged in church propaganda and religious intimidation of the parties in the process by which she was appointed judge.
Have the applicant exhausted all domestic remedies, as required by paragraph 1 of Art. 35 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms? Was there a case, according to the applicant, of a violation of Art. 9, 10 and 14 of the Convention?
Additional information
After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2009-2019 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.
Feedback
0| Period | |||
| 1 month | 3 months | 12 months | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | |